If I don't forget properly I purchased it in the course of the part scare,scarcity from the ninety's and never utilized it.

The main reason I question is due to the fact I have a major degree of H335 but I simply cannot get it to shoot as accurate as being the CFE223. I'm load 223 for my AR. Is there any way to determine the amount H335 could well be such as 27.three of CFE223 ?

The load data chart displays that when shooting identical hand-loads in the bolt gun and also the AR, the CZ 527 frequently did a lot better than the Sunshine Satan SD-fifteen with the lighter bullets, as well as the SD-fifteen typically grouped the heavier bullets far better. Plainly, barrel twist fee and chamber throat Proportions do have an impact on precision.

I like H335. It gives me superior groups in my 222 and 22-250 than H4895. It does throw some hearth out even though. It really is an exceptionally adaptable powder IMO. I haven't found it becoming dirty but I clean my guns very often.

 My load with Hornady fifty five-gr bullets was good, but his Together with the Noslers (within a Rem seven-hundred VS) wasn't.  Hot temps + a bullet that tends to generate more strain + different rifle.  Backing off at the very least 0.5 to twenty five.five or much less would resolve his stress problems. In the situation of anyone utilizing Federal .223 Rem brass which has been pointed out for causing force troubles resulting from It truly is thicker walls and thinner Website space, a decreased load is certainly suggested. That is why some posters have distinct benefits with loads that are merely high-quality for others. The vast majority of handloaders which have no technique for chronographing their operate-ups for a method of getting a take care of on stress within their guns with their factors.  When force indications appear around the brass and/or primer, then unfortunately excessive tension is presently current.  Keeping an eye on the chronograph average velocities lets you know when predicted maximum velocity continues to be attained.  In this instance it would be in the region of 3107 fps in case you average out all five resources.    Therefore backing off a tiny bit will Commonly stay clear of this which is using superior perception. A single good way of acquiring a excellent manage on what your limits must be is usually to normal data from all of the sources you may get.   In such cases, averaging all five resources gives an average utmost demand body weight of twenty five grains at 3107 fps. When you were being to toss out the "odd" optimum demand weight of Hornady and also the "odd" reduced velocity of Sierra you'd get this ordinary: twenty five.5 grains at 3134 fps - which I believe could be somewhat a lot more realistic figures for barrels while in the 20-22" range from what I've noticed. That may be why I like to refer to as several data sources as possible ahead of setting objectives for here any load function-up.  On top of that, just one need to research and see if the preferred parts can increase to tension (Federal .223 brass, Nosler Ballistic Recommendations, M193 bullets and so forth.)   Naturally this dialogue isn't about getting your "accuracy node" but just cost/stress/velocity plans or ceilings.  Even so in my situation, precision seems to enhance with boosts in charge pounds when loading H-335.  Start loads like 23 to twenty five grains are only so-so, but loads like 25.5 are Great for me.  I believe that the bullet made use of helps make An even bigger change compared to the demand weight. *While some Observe that 26.0 grains is actually a "5.fifty six NATO-pressure" load - in this individual circumstance it is apparent that accurate five.56 NATO-pressure ammo - LC M193 essentially is much hotter and 90 fps more rapidly in this particular AR15.  This will only be established from the chronograph or simply a strain barrel.  

Increase to estimate Only exhibit this user #4 · Sep 8, 2016 Here is a link to the DuPont archive file that reveals IMR powders and contains Remington bullets. It truly is aged data. Observe that the images in the powder are from the old square cans.

This is an older thread, you might not receive a response, and will be reviving an old thread. Be sure to take into consideration making a new thread.

Logged I just retain losing money and time on other makes attempting to obtain/make just one shoot like my P07 and P09.  What on earth is Erroneous with me?

I have a Hornady Digital powder evaluate/scale I exploit to the complicated powders (like IMR4198 - my favored .223 powder for compact teams) that just won't throw regular charges by way of a powder measure.

A single must be weighed For each spherical. An IMR powder, but offers me the most effective teams. I am little by little moving far from it to ball powders.

Normally, Often start out within the bare minimum powder load and function up, no matter what bullet and/or powder you're making use of.

It truly is a mix of real small discs and ball. I'm employing it now in my 650. Meters quickly but is slightly messy to implement.

I must finish the perform up on it to eliminate the can I've and have the data for moments such as this when you can't be picky.

The above mentioned comments also implement to cup-and-core bullet types, as their design, bearing area and seating depth varies more than enough to change pressures of the supplied powder charge. Whenever a bullet is substituted, start with commence loads and do the job up carefully.